Humans

We keep divided by placing eachother into groups or catagories, instead of seeing us as a whole as the human race. Each of us no matter what gender, race, or ethnicity we are have rights that can not and should not be taken away. Yet everyday millions of PEOPLE from around the world have their rights violated, intruded upon, or simply maliciously taken. When that happens we find those people in similar situations to help guide and support us. We dont realize that how or why our rights have been discarded or forgotten is not the issue, it is not the problem, nor is it going to solve it to isolate from people who havent had the same experiences as us. We keep divided by placing eachother into groups or catagories, instead of seeing us as a whole as the human race. Each of us no matter what gender, race, or ethnicity we are have rights that can not and should not be taken away. Yet everyday millions of PEOPLE from around the world have their rights violated, intruded upon, or simply maliciously taken. When that happens we find those people in similar situations to help guide and support us. We dont realize that how or why our rights have been discarded or forgotten is not the issue, it is not the problem, nor is it going to solve it to isolate from people who havent had the same experiences as us.
We are all HUMAN beings. We are all PEOPLE. From children to elderly, male to female, gay or straight. If you have been denied any of the rights guaranteed to us by the divine or (God) or whichever name you use, then you are just like the rest of us. The population as a whole almost entirely has been decieved for so long that we cant even see that it all happened right under our noses. It didnt just happen to some of us. It isnt just happening to dysfunctional families, or women, or men, or whites, or blacks……It is and will continue to happen to ALL OF HUMANITY! To every person on this planet. Unless we all open our eyes, (or close them) so we can see what is happening to us. We are slowly being conditiioned and taught how to be compliant slaves once again. Only it isnt directed at individual catagories of people. It is directed at ALL PEOPLE. Not just AMERICANS or INDIANs or AFRICANs, It is a crisis among all HUMANS. And it is the duty of those same HUMANS to stand up for themselves and the rights we are born with in order to ensure we are all free to live life and be HUMAN to ourselves and others.

Cyn

Advertisements

Diagnosis and Symptoms

*PARENTAL ALIENATION**PARENTAL ALIENATION*
309.81 PTSD 309.24 Adjustment Disorder with mixed emotionsV61.29 Affected by Parental Relationship DistressV15.42 Personal Past Childhood Psychological Abuse
Attachment Suppression – Child seeks to end relationship with targeted parent(normal range parenting considered)
I have been claiming PTSD from beginning I have not changed her diagnosis my own head.
1.   Grandiosity perception of being above targeted parent able to judge them  as a parent and a person   Ex. She is not doing what she should be to get me back (per court report)
2.   Absence of empathy She want to terminate rights so Grandma can ´decide´ instead of the judge (Gal report)
3.   Entitlement Child expects, demands to be met or they enact ´punishmen´ if not  Ex. I will tell Jill you are not a good mom if you don’t…..(visit notes)
4.   Haughty and Arrogant attitude Disdain for targeted parent (see #1 for ex)
5.   Splitting- extremes in attitudes toward the parents. One is all good One is  all bad or inadequate    Ex. Belief Im not a good mom without knowing reason for that belief

Phobic anxiety toward targeted parent   —-persistent unwarranted fear – fear cued by presence of targeted parent ex. Afraid i will kidnap her
——Severe Anxiety Response – Presence of parent provokes anxiety response, situationally provoked panic attack   Ex. her reaction at church fearing punishment
——-Avoidance of the parent – wants to avoid targeted parent due to situational anxiety or endure with great distress  Ex.  Wants to terminate rights.

FIXED FALSE BELIEF- believing Iḿ a bad mother with no logical reason suddenly
Irritability, instability, or anxiety particularly around pick up or end of visits  with targeted parent. Crying and irritability toward target parent for seemingly insignificant minor issues (Only displayed in regards to the targeted parent) Inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger  Richard Gardner- Frank Williams Parentectomy

Attachment suppression – Child seeks to end relationship with targeted parent  (normal range parenting considered)It is not true that I changed her diagnosis in my head. I have been claiming PTSD since the beginning along with parental alienation
My conclusion is based on facts and symptoms that are scientifically based and evidenced in the treatment reports of Mary Atwood

………..

Purpose of alienation is to gain or retain custody without involvement of the other parent. Extends to the other parents family and friends
Signs 1.  Does one parent refuse to allow phone contact —YES 2.  Does one parent intentionally plan other activities during parenting time—YES 3.  Does parent vilify or belittle parent or allow others to do so in front of the child —-YES 4. Does parent refuse to inform you of activities—YES 5. Does one parent unilaterally cancel parenting time—-YES 6. Does parent refuse to inform other of medical or dental appointments—-YES

 

Relevant facts and information Relevant facts and information
1.   Jurisdiction was challenged in October and August. 3 months later hearing was held regarding such
2.   Jill sworn testimony of Last known address is perjury
3.   Judge refused reinstating visits  due to objecting to mary a report
4.   P.O. judge retired months earlier, Jill showed up for no reason
5.   Carol never witnessed any violence. She only knew what she was told or overheard
6.   I moved out of perpetrators home directly following incident (see affidavit)
7.   I ensured Kiyahs safety as Carol reported evidenced by Kiyah staying at Carols temporarily since june 2014 (see affidavit)
8.   Kiyah witnessed one altercation and mother took necessary steps to prevent it from happening again
9. Mother was not made aware of investigation as Carol reported therefore could not have refused to participate
10. The current report read only that mother was using meth on a daily basis
11. Mother was not back in relationship with RJ as Carol reported
12. Mutual agreement between Mother and Carol for the care of Kiyah while mother got back on her feet again
13. Last two paragraphs of affidavit are irrelevant to abuse and based solely things Kiyah was told or overheard and pictures she was shown on facebook
14. Facts proving conclusion must be stated in the order.   Lack of compliance results in denial of federal fund.          15. Rubber stamped judges approval is violation of due process of both parent and child    16. Reports claim cindi parents her child well, isn’t this indicative of a fit parent, making TPR not in her best interest, also evidence that mental health is not a factor regarding safety of kiyah 17. Supervised visits occurring at one point to ensure sobriety and at another to ensure proper parenting  18.  Kiyah was not living with mother when she tried to commit suicide. Petition does not allege untreated mental health. Relatives are not able or willing to work with parents to meet goals of reunification. Kiyah has not lived at Carols with the exception of CPS involvement. Therapist states they are working on emotions of separating from her parents. Mother never falsely stated the apartments were approved for visits as we never went into the apart24. Kiyah has hyper-vigilance, exaggerated startle response, parentification, triangulation, all are symptoms of Parental alienation that has been ignored by all case professionals even though they recognize the signs they are neglecting to do anything about helping her or protecting her. Foster parents believe kiyah has witnessed a lot for her age, foster mom says kiyah needs to work on what happened with her mom, kiyah parrots these words. No evidence of mother coaching at visits. Foster has refused to allow phone contact. Foster intentionally enrolls child in activities during mothers visit times. Foster and Father vilify or belittle mother around the child as well as case professionals. Foster refuses to inform mother of childs activities. Foster making false statements to deprive mother of visits and being allowed to do so. Foster refuses to inform mother of medical or dental

Court report on 6-2 states No mental health issues, mother shows good parenting skills, Kiyah loves her mother, Safe home free of drugs and domestic violence

1.   Took my savings so I couldn’t leave and go to Des Moines 1.   Took my savings so I couldnt leave and go to Des Moines 2. She kept letters from me and told me years later 3. She joked that i should have been wandas daughter not hers 4. She bought my kids things they weren’t allowed to bring home with them 5. She told me I could have visits at her house and told CPS there was hostility  between us 6. She had Kiyah make up a story about school to see if I would believe her 7. She built Kiyah a bedroom and told her not to tell me cause it would hurt my feelings 8.   She told Brad I was going to leave him for RJ 9. She asked me why we couldnt raise the kids together  NOV 201410. She had me get money and things from the mailbox instead of her house so that Mike didnt see me. She bought Kiyah big castle and told me to buy her the small one for my house NOV 201412. She told me that devon didnt want to come home because of Brad. She took my kids to Disney world and left me home for first time to be alone on christmas at the same time my world ending fears may have come true.  She forged my signature to enroll Kiyah in school. She said it was my fault I should have known i would get beat up. She gives Bradell pics of my kids but not me. She was extra nice christmas before i left for cali. she bought me winter attire when i was moving to cali in two weeks. She minimized my talent and my dreams of writing and illustrating only tobe surprised later when she saw i actually was good. She lied about suicide attempts, and about incarcerations. She made brad promise to drop Kiyah off to her if we argued. She hit me in drive way and mike said i abandon my daughter for two months. When he said this she shook her head as if to tell him not to say that. She told Kiyah that she drives by everyday to make sure mommy doesnt forget to pick her up from school. She said mommy might forget but popcorn never would. She told me that as long as the kids were at her house CPS could not come take them (which is exactly what they did)25. Asked me what a pipe that you smoke meth out of is called  NOV 201426. Gave me The lost, the trial, and Cross for Xmas. Refuses to allow me phone calls to kiyah28. Plans and signs her up for things that would interfere with our visits. Says negative things around or to kiyah30. said drug week was cause of comments about me at visit. stopped involving me in devon activities.
32. *if i give her what she wants she will stop abusing me*
33. Pretended to be me and told my primary doctor not to prescribe me habit-forming drugs because i was an addict. Bought a GPS tracker for Kiyah to wear
35. Lied at the protection order hearing. Told me to manipulate the manipulator. Called night before hearing and told me she did not want to testify. Told me that this isnt how she wanted it the day kiyah was taken. Told brad mother was going to leave him for Rj.  Foster is friends with many of mothers friends on FB. Foster has numerous friends and family members in the school working and has contacts in both DHS and state of Nebraska. Foster mother has a good friend who is a notary. Foster mother never witnessed any violence or arguments. Carol never informed mother of any investigation and therefore mother could not have refused to participate. Carol planned on flying Kiyah back to Omaha that summer and saying that i took off to Cali without her and abandon her.46. Carol had Cps call to Cali to see if I had moved in end of January. Carol said Kiyah could always come stay with her but i couldnt. She bought kids toys that she refused to let them bring home so they would want to be at her house more.

Capta Definition of Child Abuse/ Neglect-  Any recent act or failure to act on the part of the parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm or creates imminent risk of serious harm. Failure to provide food, clothing, shelter, or emotional support  Capta Definition of Child Abuse/ Neglect-  Any recent act or failure to act on the part of the parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm or creates imminent risk of serious harm. Failure to provide food, clothing, shelter, or emotional supportEmotional Neglect- Isolating a child, not providing affection or emotional support exposing child to domestic violence or substances
Effects of maltreatment Intellectual and cognitive–Self esteem–relationship problems, aggression–growth delays, impaired brain function
FACTS AND RELEVANT DETAILS
Nebraska Case Law  *Child safety guide for judges and attorneys* 1.   Placement is not necessary when caregiver capacities can be supplied by  someone else 2.   Reunification is not based on completing case plan goals 3. Should be based on threats and circumstances within the home 4. Parents should know exactly what is required for reunification      (these requirements should be made part of the court order) 5.   Decision is environmental more than on action of the parents 6. Impending danger threats do not have to be reduced or eliminated for children to go home

 

*California Case Law* 1.   Must be at risk during jurisdictional hearing to sustain petition *Christopher m. (2014) 228 Cal App 4th* 2.   No jurisdiction if guardian could have ensured safety  *J.n. (2010) 181 Cal. App 4th* 3.   Must show how minor has or will be harmed  *Mathew S. 1996  41 Cal App 4th* 4.   Court lacks jurisdiction to order med treatment prior to adjudication *San Joaquin county 2010  185 Cal App 4th* 5.   S worker report that was good parent rebutted unfitness *e.h 2003  188 Cal App 4th* 6. Cps is not a super OSHA to correct minor flaws *Alysha s 1996   51 Cal App 4th *7. Perception of risk rather than actual evidence does not suffice*James R2009   176 Cal App 4th*   8.   Specific harm must be shown, mental illness of parent not sufficient * David D. 1994   28 Cal App* 9.   Drug use insufficient without link of potential harm*Rebecca C. 2014  228 Cal App 4th*10. Cannot require eval before jurisdictional hearing *Laurie s v Superior court 1994  26 Cal App*11. Child left with caretakers will not warrant finding of dependency if receiving good care

(Court cannot not rely on unalledged conduct as grounds for jurisdiction. No discretion to ignore jurisdiction. Once challenged burden is on court to prove it exists Court has no jurisdiction to determine its jurisdiction Cannot void its own void orders When judge does not obey law he becomes trespassor guilty of treason and conspiracy against US loses jurisdiction as well as immunity)

Bowers V Hardwick 478 US 186, 189 (1986)
Rule 104(a) Admissability of expert testimony
Not sufficient to merely conclude efforts have been made  (BL 491 NW 2d 789, 791, Iowa App)

Rights— 1.  Right to be notified of all court hearings and participate 2. Right to talk to worker and attorney 3. Right to have attorney ask questions  4. Right to present evidence 5. Right to know what court file contains  6. Right to see my child, unless judge determines otherwise 7. Receive a written case plan within 60 days signed by me 8. Right to copy of judges written decisions 9. TPR not required cause placed with relative. Right to have appropriate case plan. Right to know when child will be returned.

*US CASE LAW*
1.   Natural parent who demonstrated sufficient committment is free to  raise children without undue government interference*Stanley v Illinois 405 US 645 (1972) *

*US Code*
– 18 USC 4  – 28 USC 1331  – 42 USC 1983  – 42 USC 1988  – 403 US 388 (1971)  – 28 USC 2201-2202  – 28 USC 1691 all orders signed and issued under seal, writ of summons  , subpoena or order not allowed to be signed using /s/

Civil Rights Act 1871 delaware v. Board of Examiners, United State Reports 353 U.S. pages 238, 239. Sims v. Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925)”The practice of law is an occupation of common right.”
“The practice of law cannot be licensed by any state/State.”
28-716  Caller immune from liability
# 602 Rules of evidence may only testify about facts within personal knowledge
Warrant obtained through reckless disregard for the truth  Apontes Matos v Toledo Davilla Conspiracy against rights- warrant based on provable lies
Forced breakup of a natural family for sole best interest in intrusion by state is not allowed  Smith v Org. of Foster families 431 US 816, 862-63 (1977)
Right to live as a family   Meyer v Neb. 262 US 370 (1923)
Original allegation must be relevant or related to adjudication  Neb Rev. Stat. 28-720  NAC 390 4-008.01 Child protection and family safety act
Child Protection and Safety Act  28-710, 727   28-720  Jurisdiction  390 NAC 4-008.0128-719 Significant Change in Circumstance
Family Policy Act  43-532
DV insufficient for removal  Nicholson 203 F Supp 2d 153, 171, 179, 181, 186, 188, 191, 195
NCG #58@109 3 Factors Must be Questioned         #59@109 Removal only if proven clearly parent unable to protect the child even with state assistance
Conspiracy to Rights 1985 Exparte cannot be based on lies and heresy
28-728(3)(d)(viii) Interview of child not recorded as required by Nebraska Law
Rule 60b Extrinsic fraud meant to defraud mother and child relationship through deliberately planned actions and utilization of false documents or records and deprivation of constitutional right to fair trial is ground for relief and judgement should be set aside.
Rule 3  Fraud may be urged as grounds for relief under independent action

 

Facts
1.  Cindi has never been incarcerated for meth.  2.  Cindi has never been hospitalized for suicide attempts 3.  There was no prenatal exposure to meth involving Kiyah or her older brother 4.  Carol never notified Cindi of an investigation 5.  It was not possible for Corey to be coming to the family home regularly as he has been in jail since June 25, 2017 6.  Brad and Cindi moved to Victor st in October 7.  Though they were aware of my correct address, Sarah B. testified that she never tried to reach me prior to removal 8.  Father made the phone call alleging only drug use nothing else. 9. D.V. was investigated by Sarah B. immediately following June 25, 2014 and The result was the case being closed due to Kiyah being safe at Carols. Evidence that the mother took the necessary steps to ensure her child’s safety.  intake #547746 7-2-14  Was opened and investigated for neglect by Richard Coats on Kiyah Miller. It was closed a short time later with Kiyah safe at grandmas. Carol never witnessed any violence yet claims the incident was not the first time that it had happened which was false.12.  Rj did not break out all the windows in the van. He hit the window with his fist and spray painted the van. Corey cut the van in half not RJ and once again Carol nor Kiyah witnessed any of this. Neither did Cindi as she had already left. Rj did not threaten to kill himself in a message to Carol. He did not say he’d rather go to jail before he lost her.14. Carol reported I was no longer with RJ and they  helped move my stuff 6-25-14. Evidence that I left as I should have done to protect us. Reports that grandma says she witnessed a lot for her age and needs to talk bout what happened with mom.

1. Judge shook his head when Sarah  admitted to never trying to reach me since recent allegations were made
2. Judge repeatedly told me if i represented myself, I was going to lose my daughter
3. Pretrial hearing not attended by mother or father and the record was waived
4. Initial family team meeting, mother not invited
5. 1st PO left Nebraska less than 1 month after trial
6. 2nd lawyer refused to look into my concerns, said I was paranoid
7. Fathers lawyer had me kicked out for trying to record a family team meeting
8. 1st foster care review mother not aware of. 2nd one was informed of only 30 minutes prior
9. Mary Atwood testimony at trial said nothing bad about mother
10. Mary Atwood IDI had different letterheads and signatures
11. Not allowed info on therapy with daughter
12. I think GAL knows judge is corrupt so she knows she can push it and it wont matter
13. Carol Simonsen admitted to forgery on the stand
14. Mary A. is guilty of slander, reckless disregard for the truth
15. Sarah  is guilty of perjury, reckless disregard
16. GAL conspiracy to rights
17. Darcy N. Ineffective assistance of counsel
18. Leslie C. ineffective assistance of counsel
19. Brian M. Ineffective assistance of counsel
20. Judge Daniels reckless disregard, bias
21. The decision on September 20, affects an essential human right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
22. Mary A. states Kiyah has adjustment disorder but is adjusting well…..:?
23. NFC does not have a BBB listing
24. Incontro law does not have a BBB listing
25. Reliable Rock does not have a BBB listing
26. Capstone is not accredited
27. Beneficial is not accredited
28. Criteria needed to prove pathogenic parenting exists
29. Attachment suppression— Child seeks to end relationship with targeted parent (both of us)
30. Instability irritability or anxiety particularly around pick up or end of visits with targeted parent. Crying and irritability toward target parent for seemingly insignificant minor issues. Only displayed in regards to targeted parent
31. Inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger signs of alienation present in kiyah
32. Diagnosis necessary to determine alienation: PTSD/ Adjustment disorder with mixed emotions/ Affected by parental relationship distress/ Personal past childhood psychological abuse
33. Kiyahs diagnosis by Mary Atwood: PTSD/ Adjustment disorder with mixed emotions/ Affected by parental relationship distress/ Personal past childhood psychological abuse
34. Mother was out-of-town for seven days just following the DV in 2014 which is why the call to the hotline did not occur until the next month when she returned to Omaha
35. Carol never witnessed any violence
36. All DV events occurred in the same week and Carol helped move mother out of the perp home shortly after returning to Omaha
37. Mother took necessary steps to prevent it from happening again by placing kiyah with carol temporarily
38. Mother could not have refused to participate as she was not informed of investigation as Carol had stated
39. Mother has not been with RJ since this incident occurred in 2014. No further reports of violence since then
40. The report to CPS only alleged daily meth use nothing else was reported by the caller who is the father of kiyah
41. Carol picked kiyah up and took her to school so reasonable efforts were not sufficient to locate and interview the mother
42. Carol and Cindi arraignment ensured kiyahs safety and provided all meals for her
43. Kiyah described pictures that she was shown on Facebook to provide the information contained in the last two paragraphs of Exhibit A
44. Kiyah has never been inconsistent on placement desire
45. Has not lived at Carols on and off most her life
46. Exhibit A states Kiyah was living at Carols home in October of 2014 not with mother as therapist claims
47. Cindi consistently shows good parenting skills
48. FPS has no concerns with visits
49. Case plan states Cindi Parents her child well and is in good physical health, yet states that she needs to understand how mental health effects her ability to parent and supervised visits were necessary to ensure appropriate parenting skills as opposed to ensuring sobriety as previously stated

1. What are the specific behaviors that cause you to believe mothers mental health is deteriorating?
2. In the beginning Kiyah was motivated to receive therapy for mothers actions, so why has she been reluctant to talk about mother or the visits between them
3. How would Mary have any knowledge of ability to maintain employment and living arrangements?
4. Why are those only concerns? No safety concerns mentioned, only ability to maintain employment which is not even a relevant issue at this point
5. How is paternity issue any of the therapists concern
6. What is the reason for Kiyahs deteriorating mental health and why is therapy becoming more intense instead of making progress
7. Has Mary ever had any training relating to Parental alienation
8. What were the safety factors involved in the opinion that mother and father not have visits together
9. Why would mother be coaching Kiyah to say bad things about her or telling her negative things regarding herself instead of father or grandmother
10. How do you see being more closely supervised as plausible?
11. What was mother doing to counter therapy?
12. Why was therapist probing kiyah about visits with mother instead of looking at visit reports? Bad Practice
13. Have you ever told the mother what was being worked on or taught to kiyah in therapy
14. What is the reason for Kiyahs sudden change in her desire to live with her mother in just a few months time?
15. How would Kiyah have remembered what month suicide attempt happened
16. Kiyah had nightmares and sleep trouble at grandmas house but never at home
17. Why would Kiyah only see the shadow man in her safe places at popcorns house
18. Why did you not write the report about visits when ordered to do so by the judge months prior
19. Why is a TPR being filed since it is not required due to kiyah being placed with relative
20. Why should Brad need to gain independent housing when his parents house was approved for visits and reunification
21. Who has spoken of my behavior? and what specifically was the behavior
22. Why have the case plans never been appropriate to the adjudication of Domestic Violence
23. Have the conditions which brought intervention been corrected?
24. How has actions of mother harmed the minor specifically
25. How do case plans or safety plans address the issue that brought court intervention
26. What proof is there that mother is currently or has been in violent relationship since minors removal?
27. Since no one has spoken to mother including the child, how is her behavior know by therapist based on facts in any way?

*EXHIBIT LIST**EXHIBIT LIST*
Jan. 27, 2015# 1 Affidavit for removal
Feb. 25# 2 Sarah Brock Background# 3
April 13# 4 Mary A. Background
June 2# 5 Child Court form# 6 Chelsea affidavit about travel# 7 # 8 GAL Report# 9 Court Report# 10 Brad Mental Health Eval# 11 Kiyah IDI# 12 Visitation Plan# 13 Bradell Visit Reports# 14 Cindi Visit Reports# 15 Emails

Dec. 1# 16 Court Report# 17 Education Report# 18 Mary A. Report# 19 FCRO# 20 GAL Report# 21 Child Court Form# 22 Mary A. visit letter

June 1, 2016# 23 Email scheduling trouble# 24 Email experience probation# 25 Court Report# 26 Mary A. Report # 27 Brad Discharge summary# 28 FCRO# 29 GAL Report# 30 Quizzes/ FB posts
Aug. 23# 31 Court Report# 32 Cindi Case plan# 33 Brad Case plan# 34 Mary A Report# 35 Copy Certified Mail*****

Sept. 20# 36 Mary A Background# 37 Email from 1-23-16 # 38 Suing text from Nov and dec# 39 Letter from Janet Glick at florence

Nov 30 # 40 Court Report# 41 Kiyah Letter# 42# 43 GAL Report
May 30, 2017# 44 Court Report# 45 Mary A. Report# 46 Mary A. Letter# 47 Emails# 48 Mom got hurt letter# 49 # 50 FCRO# 51 GAL Report

 

Today here in this once great country we call the united states of america, there are many crimes committed daily by average citizens and government officials alike. There are many activists and advocates, people who form civil rights groups and others who protest at court houses, and still others who get legislation passed to help stop some of these from happening. With enough voices, screaming loud enough eventually injustice is stopped and relief granted, or so we hope.
But perhaps one of the most horribly shocking crimes being committed is one against the children and families in this country. This violation to every human’s right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness has been increasing at a steady rate for the last 10-20 years with no signs of being stopped. In fact, the criminals behing these acts have only become more powerful and bold in what can only be described as shocking and heartbreaking destruction that no doubt must be intentional at least in part. I am speaing of the legalized kidnapping and child trafficking that our government is funding. It is supporting the cover-ups and false fronts by hiding the true intentions from its citizens. The cause, they claim, is needed protection of our youth. Not from murderers, rapists, or thieves, but from their own parents.
Cindi Millercmnewstart2014@gmail.comFor my daughter Kiyah, Victim of alienation and Corrupt courts, I Love you and I will NEVER stop fighting!!!!!!!!

Best Interest

There is no reason I or the state should need to pay for a lawyer to represent me simply due to not knowing court procedures. At this point in the game, a new lawyer will spend more time going over my own research and in the court room than anything. I know this case like i know my name. I couldn’t forget the facts or evidence or lack therof if I tried. I know the laws, which ones where broken, and which ones were followed. I know how my daughters and my rights have been taken from us and who the guilty parties are. When I have finally won this portion and have regained custody of my child, I know who and specifically what each them have done to violate them and the laws they broke and they will all be brought to the courts attention and punished for their actions.
But my first concern as should be yours, is the well being of my child. The state has made it very clear from the beginning that they have no interest in what that really is. I have had to ask repeatedly for info and paperwork and been denied and alienated from the entire process. Ive been through this before, without real cause, and i know how its suppose to work. They have no interest in family preservation. In fact, I am not allowed to associate with her father or we been told that he risks losing her. That is a problem in itself because he is the one who made the phone call and false allegations. So not only is it a conflict of interest but another couple of laws that are being broken. Immunity being the first as well as her fathers privacy because he was named in court docs. The state has never since day 1 given any specific, relevant, or valid reasoning for their belief in a safety risk to her. Thus far they have been allowed to get away with not providing proof. They have destroyed any resemblance of “normal” family life and divided us from the start. My daughter has blamed me for not having a normal childhood because the state has taken her away twice. She blamed me for having to testify in court and parrots the words of the workers and my mother in saying untrue, bad and hurtful things about me that she has heard them say. Yet I am the one not allowed to speak to her about anything that is happening to us. I am being prohibited from being her mother or a protector. In fact, I am barely even able to be a friend to her. I have essentially been turned into a babysitter with a babysitter. They ignore my requests for more time, they ignore my concerns about the things she says and her worsening behavior and instead they blame me for them. But as visit notes will reflect it is not nor could it possibly be me causing it. The agency and the state have done exactly what they have accused me of. They abused their power, have stepped all over my daughter and I. They have disgraced the constitution and laws of this land with blatant disregard for our health , safety, welfare, and happiness. Our rights and most importantly the best interest of my child require you to send her home and revoke the current P.O. against me and dismiss this case with prejudice.

Judge or Criminal?

Im horrified at what is happening to me and my daughter. I have reached out to dozens of groups, lawyers, advocates, caseworkers as well as their supervisors, and the GAL and “professionals”  involved with my case. Still, I have found no one who is willing or able to help us get justice. 

It appears, to me at least, that this judge has some kind of a vested interest in my daughter as he looks very fond of her when asking my parents about her and how she is doing. The corruption, greed, and appearance of bias, in this case, are undeniable, and I have more than enough proof of everything I claim is happening. They have never since day one, given and specific reasons for their claim of exigent circumstances and there were no reasonable efforts to contact me prior to her removal after the 2015 intake according to the social intake workers testimony. They have also claimed me to be some kind of a safety risk to my daughter despite the visit reports that, for close to two years, never contained any risks to her safety, in fact shows the opposite by proving the mother and daughter have a very good relationship, good communication, good parenting skills, and a very loving, healthy and close bond. The visits that were occurring two times a week for two hours a day, were suspended due to “threats to case professional” that originally were made several months prior to the visits being ended and the threats were only to sue the ones involved in the crimes against us. There was never any suggestion of violence mentioned against anyone or initiated against them. I have also stated in those same “threatening” emails that my daughter is suffering from parental alienation and have offered proof of such which exists in the therapist and GAL reports as well as statements and actions of Carol and Bradell. The actions of this court and the agency have significantly contributed to this tragedy, Even if it is not intentional from the beginning, the fact that I have expressed this problem to numerous appropriate individuals and have been all but ignored and blamed for myself, makes those involved guilty of negligence, and failure to report suspected child abuse. 

Even the judge’s mannerisms, actions, and statements show malicious intent and bias against me and an appearance of favoritism for the father. The fathers’ visits were adequately protected by the judge while mine have been ended for insufficient reasons, at an improper hearing that I was never aware of in which three witnesses testified against me. This is an extreme violation of due process, especially considering the fact that from July 2015 up until Aug 2016, the court had been sending the certificate of service and all my orders or reports to the Public Defender that was fired in July 2015. That public defender also never bothered to alert me to the fact that she was receiving them and the situation continued until my hired lawyer (2 P.D. and 1 hired since case start) submitted a withdraw from the case.

There has been false documents, forged signatures, and perjury committed and the shock of anyone outside this court who is told the facts provides clear grounds for a cause of action for abuse of discretion and fraud on the court by all involved. Still, my rights are continually denied as well as my daughters and even her father who made the false allegations only to be included in them unintentionally which violates a callers immunity as required. Our rights are still being denied without consequence or even a second thought and no one is willing to stand up and do what is right. Do what is moral. Act in the best interest of Kiyah or myself. No one seems to be concerned with the reasonable questions I have asked, facts of law or this case, or the mental and psychological abuse that is and has been happening. 

The “professionals” are negating the facts and I have even been told that if and when I get my daughter back that I would have to leave the state of Nebraska if I ever wanted this to stop. I was recently told that I may have pissed off the judge by challenging his jurisdiction. My question to that is……if forcing a judge to do his job and obey the law like he should have done from the beginning on his own pisses him off, then should he even be a judge?

If following the rules and obeying the law in a fair and just manner with respect to peoples rights is a problem then your career choice should have been a criminal, not a judge. Then that begs the question, Are judges and criminals one in the same?

Cyncropped-fb_img_1436712618627-e14920106684271.jpg

I think I can……..sounds good anyway

*Paragraph 1-6 not relevant due to time passed, change in circumstances shown in affidavit, and incident had been part of a closed investigation because mother had already corrected the conditions leading to intervention.
*Intake 571834 alleging neglect of Kiyah by Cindi for daily meth use on 1-10-15 made by the father of minor.  Clear motif exists, his name was released to parties in the case (Neb. Rev. Stat. 28-710) and he was also named as a defendant with child removal from him as well. (immunity of caller violated)
* Carol reported that Cindi took Kiyah from Carol’s home then states that she picks kiyah up for school and after and feeds kiyah dinner. Conflicting statements from Carol.
*Carol falsely reported that Cindi was back in a relationship with RJ. He was released from jail and that was an assumption made due to his release.
*Kiyah reported other household members involved in an altercation that never happened, nor were there other members of the house besides her father and me.
*Kiyah being only six does not have an accurate perception of things that occur between adults or the time period that passed between events. Evidence of this is stating Corey visits family home regularly, as he was in jail from the day the D.V. incident occurred and remained there at the time of this report
*Kiyah recent move with mother to California is the cause of her knowledge of marijuana pipes, some of which were shaped like “Bubbles”
*Carol and Cindi had mutually agreed upon the arrangement to ensure that Kiyah was adequately cared for while Cindi worked to regain stability after being the victim of D.V. and leaving the perpetrator, which she had done directly after incident as reported in the affidavit as well by Carol who was not present for anything except helping Cindi move her belongings out of the home of Richard Coats
* The things described regarding RJ stem from Kiyah being shown RJ facebook page with those images by Carol. Kiyah was not present during accidental air shot rifle shooting, nor was she present at any time that RJ had facepaint(Halloween 5 years prior) or throwing up gang signs which was actually a picture of him holding a hatchet with a friend.

*The last paragraphs relating to Juggalo, knives, and clothing worn by RJ are completely irrelevant to neglect or abuse. None of those things are evidence of such.
*Also, as reported, these things were not an issue even if relevant because the mother had taken necessary steps months prior to removal to remedy the issue that brought the adjudication making it not relevant from the start of this case.
* Drug use was the only allegation in the original call and was unfounded at trial.
*Although not reported or included in the petition, mothers mental health has been listed in the judicially noticed court report dated 6-2-15 as if it had been part of the original allegations which it had not.
*Mother has never been ordered to participate in any services other than supervised visits and a psych evaluation which has no relevance to what she was adjudicated on nor was it an issue when the petition was filed. * According to Nicholson 2000 NY, removing a child based solely on that child witnessing her mother being the victim of domestic violence is unconstitutional
*Continued detention pending adjudication not allowed yet ordered in this case.
*Emergency removal occurred on 1-15-2015 and the mothers protective custody hearing was continued and set to occur on Feb 25, 2015, over a month after initial removal, and after the pretrial hearing occurred on Feb 9, 2015, that the mother nor the father was in attendance for, and the court waived the record of it, violating due process *******
The Court report dated 6-2-15 has a false incorrect history of previous interventions contained within, as well as numerous other discrepancies and misrepresentations yet was judicially noticed.
The affidavit for removal also contains provable lies and most of the things reported are simply heresy as neither Carol nor Kiyah was a witness to the things they are reporting. They are both relying on what they overheard or assumed was true without any cause.
This court lacks a factual basis for jurisdiction and has since the outset of this case almost three years ago.

***Mother challenged the jurisdiction of this court numerous times orally, during more than one hearing which was almost completely ignored at the time it was challenged. It was not until months later that a hearing to decide such was scheduled, on the same day as fathers hearing on visits was set to occur. Mother was not aware of this and did not show up because the hearing was not for her but for the father. Due to the mother not being present the oral motion was dismissed.

 

Wherefore, due to the facts listed, the mother moves this court to dismiss with prejudice this case, issue an order preventing further harassment from the state or agency, and return the minor  back to the home of her mother where she has expressed a desire to be as it was before the intervention, and any other relief the court deems appropriate under the circumstances due to the mental and psychological injury caused by this courts lack of jurisdiction and abuse of discretion in allowing the prolonged trauma to both mother and child.
Neb Rules of Evidence 27-801 heresy definition
Neb Rev Stat 43-254 Plain error, Due process
Juvenile court is reminded that all proceedings require a verbatim recording (DMB 240 Neb 349, 481  NW 2d  905 (1992)
Nothing showing adequate communication or assessment of the mother or her living conditions though she was available. No reasonable efforts or specific cause for belief minor was in danger of life or limb which would excuse the reasonable efforts that were not made. (Mainor T. 674 NW 2 d 442)
Plan not material to correct conditions leading to adjudication (JS AC CS Supra)
*Unsupported assertion of attorneys during court proceedings do not establish facts asserted unless other appropriate parties stipulate to such facts (in re interest of Amanda H 4 Neb App 293, 300 (1996)
*Statements in affidavits as to opinion, belief, or conclusions of law are of no effect. (in re Estate of Villwok, 226 Neb 693, 413 NW 2d 921 (1987)
*Affidavits offered for truth of a fact  – made on personal knowledge  – Only facts that would be admissible  into evidence  – Show that affiant is competent to   testify (Richards v Meeske, 12 Neb App 406, 675 NW 2d 707 (2004)
*If the complaint contains false statements knowingly then dismissal with prejudice is proper.
Counsel cannot waive rights which are personal to their clients. Must be waived by the parents themselves (DMB  240 Neb 349, 360, 481 NW 2d 905, 913 (1992)
By ordering the mother out of court respondent wrongfully denied her full right to be present and be heard as was done in the chambers prior to hearing which all counsel and judge held “secret” meeting discussing case while mother waited in courtroom(Canon 3A (3) and (4) Judicial Code of Conduct)

Recitation of this case has caused reasonable citizens shock. It requires by law immediate dismissal due to it being void ab into.
The judge has no discretion to decide jurisdiction and after challenge judge required to prove that he has it. Failure to do so also renders it void.

Judge or Criminal?

Im horrified at what is happening to me and my daughter. I have reached out to dozens of groups, lawyers, advocates, caseworkers as well as their supervisors, and the GAL and “professionals”  involved with my case. Still, I have found no one who is willing or able to help us get justice. 

It appears, to me at least, that this judge has some kind of a vested interest in my daughter as he looks very fond of her when asking my parents about her and how she is doing. The corruption, greed, and appearance of bias, in this case, are undeniable, and I have more than enough proof of everything I claim is happening. They have never since day one, given and specific reasons for their claim of exigent circumstances and there were no reasonable efforts to contact me prior to her removal after the 2015 intake according to the social intake workers testimony. They have also claimed me to be some kind of a safety risk to my daughter despite the visit reports that, for close to two years, never contained any risks to her safety, in fact shows the opposite by proving the mother and daughter have a very good relationship, good communication, good parenting skills, and a very loving, healthy and close bond. The visits that were occurring two times a week for two hours a day, were suspended due to “threats to case professional” that originally were made several months prior to the visits being ended and the threats were only to sue the ones involved in the crimes against us. There was never any suggestion of violence mentioned against anyone or initiated against them. I have also stated in those same “threatening” emails that my daughter is suffering from parental alienation and have offered proof of such which exists in the therapist and GAL reports as well as statements and actions of Carol and Bradell. The actions of this court and the agency have significantly contributed to this tragedy, Even if it is not intentional from the beginning, the fact that I have expressed this problem to numerous appropriate individuals and have been all but ignored and blamed for myself, makes those involved guilty of negligence, and failure to report suspected child abuse. 

Even the judge’s mannerisms, actions, and statements show malicious intent and bias against me and an appearance of favoritism for the father. The fathers’ visits were adequately protected by the judge while mine have been ended for insufficient reasons, at an improper hearing that I was never aware of in which three witnesses testified against me. This is an extreme violation of due process, especially considering the fact that from July 2015 up until Aug 2016, the court had been sending the certificate of service and all my orders or reports to the Public Defender that was fired in July 2015. That public defender also never bothered to alert me to the fact that she was receiving them and the situation continued until my hired lawyer (2 P.D. and 1 hired since case start) submitted a withdraw from the case.

There has been false documents, forged signatures, and perjury committed and the shock of anyone outside this court who is told the facts provides clear grounds for a cause of action for abuse of discretion and fraud on the court by all involved. Still, my rights are continually denied as well as my daughters and even her father who made the false allegations only to be included in them unintentionally which violates a callers immunity as required. Our rights are still being denied without consequence or even a second thought and no one is willing to stand up and do what is right. Do what is moral. Act in the best interest of Kiyah or myself. No one seems to be concerned with the reasonable questions I have asked, facts of law or this case, or the mental and psychological abuse that is and has been happening. 

The “professionals” are negating the facts and I have even been told that if and when I get my daughter back that I would have to leave the state of Nebraska if I ever wanted this to stop. I was recently told that I may have pissed off the judge by challenging his jurisdiction. My question to that is……if forcing a judge to do his job and obey the law like he should have done from the beginning on his own pisses him off, then should he even be a judge?

If following the rules and obeying the law in a fair and just manner with respect to peoples rights is a problem then your career choice should have been a criminal, not a judge. Then that begs the question, Are judges and criminals one in the same?

Cyncropped-fb_img_1436712618627-e14920106684271.jpg